Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Folded\s+Unipole\s+vs\s+Series\s+Fed\s+Vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Folded\s+Unipole\s+vs\s+Series\s+Fed\s+Vertical\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Folded Unipole vs Series Fed Vertical (score: 1): Author: herbs@islands.vi (Herb Schoenbohm); Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 10:11:11 -0400; For years I have been beating the drum for the benefits associated with building a wire cage around a grounded tower as a convenient and more efficient method of obtaining an effective top band verti; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00119.html (8,466 bytes)
2. Topband: Folded Unipole vs Series Fed Vertical (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 19:17:32 -0500; Hi Herb, This isn't the first time the false claims that folded elements offer efficiency advantages has been reputed. It probably won't be the last because the claims of efficiency improvements, eve; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00123.html (8,653 bytes)
3. Topband: Folded Unipole vs Series Fed Vertical (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein K0HA); Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 23:22:05 -0800; Correcting an address typo on the NAB paper concerning folded unipoles vs. a series fed vertical, instead see: http://www.dlr.com/dlrweb/papers/nabpaper/Nabpaper.htm I recommend reading it! I am a li; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00124.html (9,837 bytes)
4. Topband: Folded Unipole vs Series Fed Vertical (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 08:33:45 -0500; I've found systems that behave like that Bill. They almost max out at 30 or 40 radials. If you look at LB&E's paper...if the radials are only .234 wl long the curve is almost totally flat at 50 radi; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00129.html (7,983 bytes)
5. Topband: Folded Unipole vs Series Fed Vertical (score: 1): Author: kaufmann@ll.mit.edu (John Kaufmann); Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 09:54:50 -0500; As I recall, the Lewis, Brown, & Epstein paper did show a small additional gain (something like 1 dB, maybe a bit less) by going to 120 radials but only when those radials were on the order of 0.4 wa; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00132.html (8,131 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]