Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FT8\s+on\s+160m\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: FT8 on 160m (score: 1)
Author: Roger Parsons via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 20:43:14 +0000 (UTC)
As we all know, CQWW produces huge activity on all HF bands. This year I was hearing stations up to well above 1850kHz. I have found that trying to run Europe is often more productive in the 1840-185
/archives//html/Topband/2017-11/msg00136.html (7,470 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: FT8 on 160m (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 16:17:46 -0500
As a practical matter there are several 2 kHZ segments of each band that are now devoted to 24x7 JT65, FT8, and other digital modes. Weak signal CW work - eg working rare mults or even just weak guys
/archives//html/Topband/2017-11/msg00137.html (8,468 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: FT8 on 160m (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 16:19:11 -0700
The normal bandwidth for FT8 is 2.5 to 2.8 kc.  at 1.842.9 you should have been outside the FT8 band.  Hardly anyone operates above 2.5 it seems anyway.  I think you  were essentially being trolled. 
/archives//html/Topband/2017-11/msg00141.html (9,809 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: FT8 on 160m (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 16:14:46 -0800
My WSTJ waterfall shows about 50Hz bandwidth for ft8 signals. In "band plan" theory the ft8 segment is 1840 to 1842.5. However, many rigs won't pass audio much below 300Hz and may not above 2.5KHz. I
/archives//html/Topband/2017-11/msg00143.html (9,387 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: FT8 on 160m (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:28:19 +0300
http://www.iaru-r1.org/index.php/downloads/func-startdown/718/   IARU Region 1 160m Band plan: 1810 - 1838 200 CW,1836 kHz QRP Centre of Activity 1838 - 1840 500 Narrow band modes 1840 - 1843 2700 Al
/archives//html/Topband/2017-11/msg00147.html (7,649 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: FT8 on 160m (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:23:57 -0500
To me, the issue comes down to contained or not contained when it comes to signals on the bands. We're already contained by the limits of the band itself so there's effectively a finite space for eve
/archives//html/Topband/2017-11/msg00157.html (9,271 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu