https://swling.com/blog/2018/02/fcc-authorizes-wireless-power-transmission-experimental-station https://apps.fcc.gov/els/GetAtt.html?id=204036&x=. http://www.texzontechnologies.com/technology Tesla t
I agree about the pie. I have done a bit of reading. Their experimental station will use a 50kW broadcast xmtr to (they say) generate a Zenneck surface vertical EM wave with little radiation loss i
companies vast outside plant of poles, HV lines and xfmrs..out of business any time soon. The same outfit has been applying for these experimental licences for years now. Jim VE7RF <I agree about the
I don't care that this will never be a practical way of transferring power . . . But aren't any of you guys worried about the fact that their licence allows them to transmit ANWHERE within Top Band?
I read their experiment. They will transmit only a CW (unmodulated) signal for the minimum time needed to complete a field strength reading. The only frequency where they will run 1000W "radiated"
I think I read that they also provided a phone number to someone with a 'kill switch' in case QRM does occur. Bill K4JYS I read their experiment. They will transmit only a CW (unmodulated) signal fo
Without question it leaves the gate open for a flood of signals that will do away with ALL weak signal work on that band. Definition of weak signal in this case anything less than an effective ERP le
Kill switch will be good main tx out of our band will be good. I am all for experimental projects. Thats what we do too However on a non interference basis. Make this a great day Dale _______________
I thought they were limited to 1.8000 MHz on the 160m band. No? Whatever the case --after reading the related recent posts here-- all the fuss, fuming and fulminating over a *temporary* carrier --on
Until it happens. Like Brexit or It think its the prudent thing to get ahead of this and understand it and be prepared to fight it if it causes problems. Its hard to put certain Genies back into the
Well they are actually licensed to transmit between 1710 and 1900 kHz . . . And what is worrying is the licence also states: "the occupied bandwidth of the emission shall not extend beyond the band l
Isn't this a done deal? It's been authorized by the FCC! What can we do, except react to any QRM that might occur? 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.con
Roger, I don't like this anymore than you do. *But Brian said he read it, *and I believe what he stated below. And others here have said similar things about this. Maybe we're occupying too much band
A few excerpts from Texzon's license request: As well as under the control of Amateur licensee: Michael Paul Taylor FRN: 0024766438 General Class Amateur License call sign KG5IUC Texzon will be condu