Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Extended\s+Inverted\s+\"L\"\s+Antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Extended\s+Inverted\s+\"L\"\s+Antennas\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Extended Inverted "L" Antennas (score: 1): Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 15:34:27 -0400; Here's a query for you more experienced inverted "L" afficianados... Would I benefit from (possibly) optimizing the low angle radiation of my inverted "L" antenna, if it was to be cut exactly 1/4-wav; /archives//html/Topband/2007-09/msg00034.html (7,747 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Extended Inverted "L" Antennas (score: 1): Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:35:19 -0700; It would probably be difficult to detect much difference in low angle signal between your current configuration and a shorter version. The signal for close-in stations via high angle paths could drop; /archives//html/Topband/2007-09/msg00037.html (8,866 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]