Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Edge\-wound\s+inductors\s+vs\s+round\s+stock\s+$was\s+Air\s+Wound\s+Coil$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Edge\-wound\s+inductors\s+vs\s+round\s+stock\s+$was\s+Air\s+Wound\s+Coil$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Edge-wound inductors vs round stock (was Air Wound Coil) (score: 1): Author: Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 16:49:21 +0000; I recently ran across this discussion on another radio forum, claiming that edge wound is inferior in terms of Q to round wire. It was said that on a flat strip, the current tends to crowd to the two; /archives//html/Topband/2018-09/msg00067.html (10,459 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Edge-wound inductors vs round stock (was Air Wound Coil) (score: 1): Author: MU 4CX250B <4cx250b@miamioh.edu>; Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 20:15:25 -0700; Don raises interesting points. A couple of minor addenda. First, keep in mind that "skin depth," iwhich is the tendency of an AC current to flow near a conductor surface, is frequency dependent. The; /archives//html/Topband/2018-09/msg00076.html (12,273 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]