Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ET7L\s+DXCC\s+approval\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: ET7L DXCC approval (score: 1)
Author: "Johann Bruinier" <Bruinier@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 15:41:37 +0100
Does anyone know the reason(s) for ARRL's withholding the approval for the excellent ET7L operation? Another unpleasant item is the growing use of remote RXs. It's not difficult to identify the faker
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00102.html (7,160 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: ET7L DXCC approval (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 09:51:14 -0500
This is going to be a much bigger issue than the adultered 18M QSLs. :^) I don't know how easy it is to detect the use of a remote RX, unless a P5 contact at 12 noon local time is claimed. :^)) 73 de
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00103.html (7,508 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: ET7L DXCC approval (score: 1)
Author: "Chortek, Robert L." <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 14:56:30 +0000
Their license was apparently approved and issued by the wrong governmental department. 73, Bob AA6VB Sent from my iPhone _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topb
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00104.html (7,355 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: ET7L DXCC approval (score: 1)
Author: Merv Schweigert <k9fd@flex.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 06:04:40 -1000
I see a lot of remote receiver and transmitter use, so far its not being addressed that I know of. I got blasted yesterday on the DX clusters because I was spotting A45, 3B9, 3B8, RA9 etc, LID on the
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00107.html (7,902 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu