- 1. Topband: EP6T (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill and Liz" <magoo@isp.ca>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 07:19:12 -0500
- Last night the expedition had a pretty good signal on 80M...workable,I thought, by anyone running a bit of power, some long deep QSB but also some surprisingly long peaks too. In the time that I spen
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00148.html (7,219 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: EP6T (score: 1)
- Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:30:05 -0400
- EP6T was easy to work on 160 meters last night perhaps due to some equatorial skewing and some skilled operators who had a NA set aside on 1828. without this breaking the EU wall would have been impo
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00151.html (9,550 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: EP6T (score: 1)
- Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:51:57 -0600
- This should have been easy, but no joy here. EP6T was peaking S9 in Alabama last night on 80 meters. They were 30 dB over my noise floor. That means there should be stations from NA at least S9 at th
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00159.html (10,895 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: EP6T (score: 1)
- Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:58:12 -0500
- Herb, Congratulations on the 160 contact! I still haven't heard a peep but its good to know some of us are getting the Q. Last night was a bit irritating on 80 in that I heard their weak signal, buil
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00160.html (11,293 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: EP6T (score: 1)
- Author: Greg - ZL3IX <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:31:32 +1300
- I have heard them on 160m from ZL, on just one morning. They were only just above the noise, but a QSO would have been possible, maybe with some repeats, in non-expedition conditions. It was early on
- /archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00162.html (7,656 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu