Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Drake\s+mods\s+\-\s+was\:\s+What\'s\s+best\s+$your\s+opinion$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Drake\s+mods\s+\-\s+was\:\s+What\'s\s+best\s+$your\s+opinion$\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Drake mods - was: What's best (your opinion) (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:09:24 -0600; Tom you made mention of "second only to the Drake" in an earlier post regarding receiver performance. I would be interested in hearing about the Drake being used and how it's configured. I have a ver; /archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00163.html (9,293 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]