Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Displacement\s+currents\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Displacement\s+currents\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Displacement currents (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 08:51:11 -0400; Displacement currents are fictitious currents that were "created" or invented to explain how current flowing into one lead of a capacitor manages to flow out of the other lead, without charges actua; /archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00033.html (7,958 bytes)
2. Topband: Displacement currents (score: 1): Author: dbowker@mail.sjv.net (Dave Bowker); Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 15:13:20 -0400; Tom, I think there may be a slight misunderstanding here. Displacement currents DO NOT flow through the ground, but currents which are considered to be flowing from the element, through the air diele; /archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00035.html (7,516 bytes)
3. Topband: Displacement currents (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 22:56:10 -0400; Hi Dave, My point is the only way to reduce loss with a vertical near earth is to provide a conductive path for the currents back to the antenna area as evenly as possible over a large area that exte; /archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00037.html (7,494 bytes)
4. Topband: Displacement currents (score: 1): Author: k9uwa@arrl.net (John K9UWA); Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 23:10:34 -0500; Sounds pretty simple to me. 0.025wl = 13 feet and if your radial field is 1/4 wl then it would take 65 radials 135 feet long and at the far end they would be a max. of 13 feet apart. John k9uwa John; /archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00039.html (7,247 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]