Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Discharging\s+static\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Discharging\s+static\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Discharging static (score: 1): Author: jkearman@att.net (Jim Kearman); Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:58:50 +0000; I'm contemplating a balloon-supported vertical where the base will be ~1/4 wave above ground. I plan to use two symmetrical 1/4-wave horizontal radials. The vertical element will be supported above t; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00176.html (7,104 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Discharging static (score: 1): Author: "Logan Dietz" <cdietz@swbell.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:49:10 -0600; I found that my balloon built static and caused noise in the receiver unless I had about 50 feet of line between the top of the vertical and the balloon. I used insulated wire to minimize charging. I; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00178.html (7,294 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Discharging static (score: 1): Author: "Ed Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:37:04 -0500; feed point, sufficient? Hi Jim, I can't see why it shouldn't be sufficient -- I used to place an old surplus 2.5 mh. RF choke right from my Beverage to ground (back when that antenna was 1600' long); /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00179.html (7,847 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]