Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Dirty\s+Harry\s+and\s+the\s+DX\s+window\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Dirty Harry and the DX window (score: 1)
Author: Steve Ireland <vk6vz@arach.net.au>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:14:15 +0800
G'day Thanks for all on the reflector who emailed me in support of my comments about the danger of DX stations outside the main populations centres in the northern hemisphere giving up on operating i
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00134.html (7,794 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Dirty Harry and the DX window (score: 1)
Author: Eric Scace K3NA <eric@k3na.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:29:40 -0500
There is another part of Steve's rule that is required to make it work as intended. A DX station operating in the window MUST ONLY LISTEN OUTSIDE THE WINDOW. -- Eric K3NA on 05 Dec 10 20:14 Steve Ire
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00135.html (7,293 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Dirty Harry and the DX window (score: 1)
Author: "on4ww" <on4ww@pandora.be>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 13:14:52 +0100
Why ? IMO, during contests : - split operation should be avoided. It is only warranted when the pileup/chaos gets uncontrolable. - working 1up 'inside' the DX-window, is of course nogo at all times.
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00143.html (7,596 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Dirty Harry and the DX window (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:06:10 -0500
make it work as intended. A DX station WINDOW. Contest DX Windows would be worth a lot more for DX if they used split operation like that, but band space is already at a premium. I'm afraid the bad
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00146.html (9,181 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Dirty Harry and the DX window (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <rimradio@direcway.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 12:42:15 -0700
I tend to agree with Eric, and here are a few thoughts why. I'm fairly new to 160m but I've been DXing for over 30 years. It seems that everyone monitors the DX window during a contest and pileups bu
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00152.html (9,716 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Dirty Harry and the DX window (score: 1)
Author: "Pat Collins N8VW" <n8vw@linuxcolumbus.com>
Date: 11 Dec 2005 17:07:43 -0500
(I expect this post to be moderated, but here goes with tongue firmly in cheek.) And we could call it the PEI 160 QSO Party since the US midwest would have better things to do that weekend. How about
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00157.html (8,547 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Dirty Harry and the DX window (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:38:00 -0500
years. It seems pileups build the 160m several times I think the real reason pileups are such a mess is everyone wants to be the very last station calling and people call just because they hear some
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00158.html (8,973 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Dirty Harry and the DX window (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 23:14:53 +0000
So if there are hundreds of stations calling the dx, the suggestion is that you can only drop your call twice? So instead of riotous tail-ending, you actually give the dx a chance to come back to som
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00160.html (8,356 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Dirty Harry and the DX window (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:16:56 -0500
IMHO, Responding to the idea that there needs to be a window, and without referring to a specific contest The choice of frequencies below probably would need adjusting, and are specified only for pre
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00164.html (9,765 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Dirty Harry and the DX window (score: 1)
Author: topband-bounces@contesting.com (by way of Bill Tippett<btippett@alum.mit.edu>)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 07:53:02 -0500
We all know that if You want to absolutely win a Contest (a pure nonsense in my opinion) You have to move where geographical/propagation conditions maximize scores, obtaining the best benefit by cont
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00170.html (9,647 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu