Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Detuning\s+Vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Detuning\s+Vertical\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: detuning vertical (score: 1): Author: polkram@it.pl (polkram); Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 15:18:13 +0100; Hello Guys, I am happy user of V160S from TITANEX, works quite good. My problems concern setuning vertical durnig receivin. I have not enough palce to place my receiving antenas far enough to avoid c; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00025.html (6,654 bytes)
2. Topband: Detuning Vertical (score: 1): Author: Michael Rauh <mikerauh@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 03:53:24 -0700 (PDT); Hello Topband, I plan to put up a quarter-wave vertical for 160M. I would like to add an 80M vertical suspended by a catenary from the larger antenna. When I model this situation in EZNEC, driving th; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00084.html (6,802 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Detuning Vertical (score: 1): Author: Michael Rauh <mikerauh@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 13:15:49 -0700 (PDT); "a grounded half wave (which is what your 160 vertical is on 80M) is about as well detuned as you'll get." Gary, Thank you and others who responded. I modeled some more, testing a resonant trap and b; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00109.html (7,248 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]