Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+DX\s+recognition\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+DX\s+recognition\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: DX recognition (score: 1): Author: Larry via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 12:13:25 +0000; HAving been inactive for many years before getting back into ham radio last year, I will not bore the list with my opinions on remote operation and how that is handled. I would like, however, to ask; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00154.html (7,134 bytes)
2. Topband: DX recognition (score: 1): Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 06:59:12 -0600; more worthwhile? It might come to that one day, Larry. With LoTW being a major feeder into DXCC credits, it would take a lot of work for someone else to pick this up and run with it. But there is ce; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00156.html (7,144 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: DX recognition (score: 1): Author: Steve Flood <kk7uv@bresnan.net>; Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 06:55:32 -0700; Perhaps something based more on distance and grid squares....like the Stew. However rare, I got no big thrill working K1N. 160,80,40 came easy with no amp and only a few calls. The trick was getting; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00161.html (7,987 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]