Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+DX\s+Engineering\s+ARAV2\-1P\s+Receive\s+Antenna\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: DX Engineering ARAV2-1P Receive Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Camac" <n4ox@frontiernet.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:56:48 -0600
Is anyone using a single DX Engineering ARAV2-1P vertical receive antenna on 160 or 80 meters? I have one and it doesn't seem to be working very well at all. Yes, I have communicated with DX Engineer
/archives//html/Topband/2008-11/msg00234.html (7,011 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: DX Engineering ARAV2-1P Receive Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:34:19 -0700
At my QTH, little verticals like this one receive the same as the big 90 foot transmitting vertical, in terms of signal to noise ratio. Which is to say all my verticals have made inferior receiving a
/archives//html/Topband/2008-11/msg00245.html (9,424 bytes)

3. Topband: DX Engineering ARAV2-1P Receive Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Rod Ehrhart/DXE" <rehrhart@dxengineering.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:21:44 -0500
Hello Jay, We have noticed your posting on Topband, so we will offer some additional information. The single Active Receive Vertical Antenna is designed as a no-gain antenna with a flat response acro
/archives//html/Topband/2008-12/msg00022.html (10,285 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: DX Engineering ARAV2-1P Receive Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:03:26 -0700
It has zero dB voltage gain, but a substantial power gain, because of the difference between the input and output impedance. The response is not flat across several octaves. The instructions specific
/archives//html/Topband/2008-12/msg00030.html (8,757 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu