Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+DX\s+Engineering\s+4\-Square\s+RX\s+Antenna\:\s+Element\s+Amplifiers\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: DX Engineering 4-Square RX Antenna: Element Amplifiers? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Maass K8ND" <jmaass@k8nd.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 21:15:17 -0400
In January, Jim W8WTS and I were at PJ2T for CQWW 160 CW, and we both noted that our DX Engineering 4-square RX antenna did not appear to perform as well as usual. It is a 98-foot configuration using
/archives//html/Topband/2015-09/msg00100.html (8,777 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: DX Engineering 4-Square RX Antenna: Element Amplifiers? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 20:12:31 -0700
1. It appears that the s21 testing was done using the 50 ohm source impedance of the VNA. This test doesn't really put the amplifier through its paces. Instead, put a small capacitor in series with t
/archives//html/Topband/2015-09/msg00101.html (8,834 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: DX Engineering 4-Square RX Antenna: Element Amplifiers? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 23:37:12 -0400
~ .5 dB might make as much as a change from 25 dB F/B to 20 dB. I wouldn't expect it to be noticeable. -- Original Message -- From: "Jeff Maass K8ND" <jmaass@k8nd.com> To: "Topband Mailing List" <top
/archives//html/Topband/2015-09/msg00102.html (10,768 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu