Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+DSP\s+Units\s+on\s+Topband\,\s+Info\s+Wanted\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+DSP\s+Units\s+on\s+Topband\,\s+Info\s+Wanted\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: DSP Units on Topband, Info Wanted (score: 1): Author: k3nd@yahoo.com (GALE STEWARD); Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 09:53:28 -0700 (PDT); I don't remember seeing this thread before so here goes. Since it's summer, I've been thinking of what kind of station improvements that I can make. I'm wondering what improvement people have found b; /archives//html/Topband/1999-07/msg00023.html (7,365 bytes)
2. Topband: DSP Units on Topband, Info Wanted (score: 1): Author: lee@crcltd.com (Lee Ward); Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 17:46:36 -0500; Stew, I am using a TS-870, and the DSP is pretty impressive under various 160 noise condx. The worst is still QRN from storms. If the signal is weaker than the QRN then it is just plain wiped out. If; /archives//html/Topband/1999-07/msg00024.html (7,877 bytes)
3. Topband: DSP Units on Topband, Info Wanted (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:03:09 -0400; Hi Gale, Since I worked on some DSP designs, I've had most types here to "gut and inspect". There is very little difference in the way the good ones work, and they all have very limited advantage wit; /archives//html/Topband/1999-07/msg00026.html (8,840 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]