Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Compromise\s+vertical\s+loading\s+questions\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Compromise vertical loading questions (score: 1)
Author: Björn SM0MDG <bjorn@sm0mdg.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:47:36 +0500
Here are some question for anyone with more tech skills than me; My compromise vertical at 8Q7BM is made of thin wire attached to a DX-Wire 15 meter glass fibre pole. The vertical wire goes all the w
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00309.html (7,880 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Compromise vertical loading questions (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 03:54:54 -0500
Hi, Bjorn Well I would expect that moving the loading coil higher would be more beneficial than improving the top loading spokes, as it would move the high current portion of the antenna higher above
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00310.html (9,456 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Compromise vertical loading questions (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:54:18 -0500
How much I can improve by moving the coil up. What improvement should I expect if center loading at about 7 meter? How about moving the coil all the way up to the top loading spokes? Is it worth the
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00311.html (9,713 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Compromise vertical loading questions (score: 1)
Author: "JC N4IS" <n4is@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:38:43 -0500
Hi Bjorn How much I can improve by moving the coil up. What improvement should I expect if center loading at about 7 meter? How about moving the coil all the way up to the top loading spokes? Is it w
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00313.html (7,982 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Compromise vertical loading questions (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:29:48 -0500
Hi, Bjorn Well, I can't argue with JC. With my first ever inverted L for 160, I had similar experiences as did his friend, AA7JV with; submerged radials. In my case, the inverted L was on the dam of
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00314.html (10,285 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Compromise vertical loading questions (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:06:49 -0500
One additional point about this that I might not have expressed in enough detail. When a top hat with significant capacitance compared to distributed capaciatnce along the radiator is involved, curre
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00317.html (9,542 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Compromise vertical loading questions (score: 1)
Author: Yuri Blanarovich <k3bu@optimum.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:22:22 -0500 (EST)
   On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 07:54 AM, Tom W8JI wrote:    > How much I can improve by moving the coil up. What improvement should I expect if center loading at about 7 meter? How about moving the coil
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00326.html (10,434 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Compromise vertical loading questions (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:38:58 +0100
The discussion is about the placement of an additional loading coil and its influence while the radiator is already loaded by a capacitance hat. So who spreads misinformation? Here we go again, Tom s
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00327.html (8,220 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Compromise vertical loading questions (score: 1)
Author: Merv Schweigert <k9fd@flex.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:14:29 -1000
Yes no doubt, it seems if a persons personal agenda precedes their ability to read with any comprehension on this reflector so many times, here we go again. The discussion is about the placement of a
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00331.html (9,030 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Compromise vertical loading questions (score: 1)
Author: HAROLD SMITH JR <w0rihps@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 19:39:43 -0800 (PST)
Amen Merv, You hit the nail on the head ! ! 73 Price W0RI Yes no doubt, it seems if a persons personal agenda precedes their ability to read with any comprehension on this reflector so many times, he
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00340.html (9,676 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Compromise vertical loading questions (score: 1)
Author: Björn SM0MDG <bjorn@sm0mdg.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:10:33 +0500
Thanks for all the input received. In short it seems like lifting the coil would not do much difference. Raising/increasing the angle of the top loading spokes might be the better option. Then of cou
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00371.html (11,019 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu