Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Common\-mode\s+noise\/long\s+buried\s+feedline\s+runs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Common\-mode\s+noise\/long\s+buried\s+feedline\s+runs\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Common-mode noise/long buried feedline runs (score: 1): Author: "Mike Bragassa" <bragassa@consolidated.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 07:40:52 -0600; TB-er's: OK; best to suppress common-mode at the feed-point; agree. What about long feedline runs...buried? My 80 , 160 xmit antenna's and Beverages each have at least 300 foot coaxial feedline runs,; /archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00027.html (8,769 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Common-mode noise/long buried feedline runs (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:32:11 -0500; You only need to suppress where there is a less-than-perfect shield connection or the potential for one. That long cable run can be buried or ten feet above ground and it won't matter. Many of my ca; /archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00028.html (8,288 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Common-mode noise/long buried feedline runs (score: 1): Author: Telegrapher9@aol.com; Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 10:33:49 EST; Mike, Tom's, W8JI, experience with this shows that in hIs situation it is not difficult to deal with. Food for thought for those who have had issues or want to know the magnitude of the coupling.Ther; /archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00033.html (7,976 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Common-mode noise/long buried feedline runs (score: 1): Author: Les Kalmus <w2lk@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:21:40 -0500 (GMT-05:00); "then you might want to suppress common mode leaving the shack AFTER the cables pass through the entrance grounding panel (we all are safe and have them, right?) on the way out to the antennas." This; /archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00036.html (8,531 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]