Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Comments\s+on\s+High\s+Performance\s+RX\s+Antennas\s+for\s+a\s+Small\s+Lot\s+\(Webinar\)\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Comments on High Performance RX Antennas for a Small Lot (Webinar) (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 21:37:56 -0800
In this webinar, it was asserted (without explanation) that for every 1 dB increase in RDF, you get 1.5 to 2.0 dB improvement in S/N ratio. I've never heard that before and don't even see how it make
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00051.html (7,049 bytes)

2. Topband: Comments on High Performance RX Antennas for a Small Lot (Webinar) (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 01:57:26 -0500
Hi Rick, I would also think that peak radiation angle of the RX antenna versus the arrival angle of the desired signal is also a big variable that would not allow the relationship you heard on the we
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00052.html (8,337 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Comments on High Performance RX Antennas for a Small Lot (Webinar) (score: 1)
Author: "JC" <n4is@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 08:57:48 -0500
Hi Rick As I told in the webinar it is a measured practical result, not a math calculation.. I have a DDC SRD and several receiving antennas in a very clean environment, only one TX antenna detuned,
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00054.html (9,644 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Comments on High Performance RX Antennas for a Small Lot (Webinar) (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 09:59:34 -0500
The RDF seems to be the best we have at the moment, for taking a 3-dimensional pattern and turning it into a single number. Of course the details of the 3-dimensional pattern are lost. In addition to
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00056.html (9,011 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Comments on High Performance RX Antennas for a Small Lot (Webinar) (score: 1)
Author: donovanf@starpower.net
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 12:03:37 -0500 (EST)
Hi Tim, While RDF is helpful, nothing substitutes for devoting the effort to analyze the detailed antenna pattern. RDF is especially useful in quiet rural areas with very few homes and power lines an
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00059.html (11,285 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Comments on High Performance RX Antennas for a Small Lot (Webinar) (score: 1)
Author: "JC" <n4is@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 13:11:04 -0500
Hi Frank I agree with you. I'm near Fort Lauderdale in a city lot, directivity from my Vertical WF did help me a lot on 160, some rare DX like 4W6 was possible only direct and using the vertical WF.
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00067.html (13,210 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Comments on High Performance RX Antennas for a Small Lot (Webinar) (score: 1)
Author: "James Wolf" <jbwolf@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 13:56:57 -0500
It seems as though if data were taken as to categorize the (average or typical) noise temperature with the angle of intensity of atmospheric noise that this could be utilized as part of the RDF equat
/archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00076.html (12,967 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu