Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Coax\s+Loops\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Coax\s+Loops\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Coax Loops (score: 1): Author: "GU4YOX" <gu4yox@cwgsy.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:40:15 -0800; Pete (HB9DSU) was asking about coax loops. I did some work on coax loops a few years ago and have had great results. On occasions the signal levels are higher than on my Beverages but sometimes the c; /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00376.html (7,027 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Coax Loops (score: 1): Author: Markus Hansen <mkve7ca@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:16:42 -0800; I agree with Bob. In noisy locations a coax loop or flag antenna can make a big difference. If you live in the country away from other humans and all their electronic RFI generators then it is unlikl; /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00380.html (8,521 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Coax Loops (score: 1): Author: Björn Mohr <bm@broadcast.se>; Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:49:13 +0100; My QTH is in a very quiet / rural location but I will argue that any loop (or other RX antenna) will improve s/n ratio compared to the TX antenna, especially if it is a vertical. I use a 20ft coax lo; /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00411.html (7,617 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]