Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Clicks\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Clicks\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Clicks (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:55:46 -0500; Using a noise blanker is a bad idea, but you know with a simple design change we COULD use our blankers with overload problems....but that is for another day. After some more thought, I revisited th; /archives//html/Topband/2002-01/msg00096.html (9,175 bytes)
2. Topband: Clicks (score: 1): Author: w7dd@msn.com (D. Andersen); Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 15:58:07 -0700; A modification I have performed on my IC-756pro noise blanker minimizes this problem. It also helps with SSB activated noise blanker splatter. It is a receiver modification. I have by-passed the filt; /archives//html/Topband/2002-01/msg00098.html (7,502 bytes)
3. Topband: Clicks (score: 1): Author: earlham@radiks.net (earlham@radiks.net); Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:42:03 +0000; While it's nice to help solve the NB overload and clicks problems on the receive side, it's the lack of engineering attention to the transmit side that really has me concerned. Too bad we can't get s; /archives//html/Topband/2002-01/msg00101.html (6,601 bytes)
4. Topband: Clicks (score: 1): Author: n0tt1@juno.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 21:17:50 +0000; If we all quit buying substandard radios, THEN they will listen! 73, Charlie, N0TT; /archives//html/Topband/2002-01/msg00102.html (6,353 bytes)
5. Topband: Clicks (score: 1): Author: ve3zi@hotmail.com (Roger P); Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 14:47:01; I would like to apologise to anybody whose contacts and enjoyment of the band have been disrupted by my clicks. I thought I was being very smart by using the low level TX/RX connection to my IC-765 r; /archives//html/Topband/2001-03/msg00053.html (8,073 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]