Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Capacity\s+Hat\s+Wire\s+Size\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Osterberg <n9bx73@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 09:31:48 -0600
Good Morning:\ To improve my 160 vertical I want to change its configuration from an inverted L to a Capacity Hat Vertical.  Vertical will be 57 Feet high with Capacity Hat wires.  I am using an 18 M
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00006.html (6,876 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size (score: 1)
Author: Raymond Benny <rayn6vr@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 11:41:15 -0700
Hello Bruce, I have a 72 ft irrigation pipe vertical for 160m. It is much stronger that your Spider pole. I use 16 ga wire for my 4 top hat wires. I'm not sure how many top hat wires you have in mind
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00007.html (8,374 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size (score: 1)
Author: "GEORGE WALLNER" <aa7jv@atlanticbb.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 19:19:24 -0500
Bruce, I often use an 18 m Spiderpole with two loading wires, sloping out from the tip at about 60 degrees. I use 18 gauge insulated wires and run 1500 W. I have not seen any signs of overheating. Cu
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00008.html (8,639 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size (score: 1)
Author: Don Greenbaum <don@aurumtel.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 19:32:04 -0500
Bruce, and George is always loud where ever he goes!!!! Don N1DG At 07:19 PM 1/2/2018, GEORGE WALLNER wrote: Bruce, I often use an 18 m Spiderpole with two loading wires, sloping out from the tip at
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00009.html (8,966 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size (score: 1)
Author: "VK3HJ" <vk3hj_luke@barefoothorse.com.au>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 17:00:13 +1100
In my station for the past several years I have run a top loaded vertical of similar dimension to what you propose. A Spider pole is something I would only use in a portable application, not a perman
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00010.html (9,217 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size (score: 1)
Author: Mike DeChristopher <mfdechristopher@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 14:28:22 -0500
Bruce, I used to resonate my tower on 80m with 22 ga wire in two directions. Never a problem with power handling at 1.5kW; I probably would have used bigger stuff if I had any in the garage at the ti
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00011.html (8,315 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size (score: 1)
Author: "Adrian Van Der Byl" <vk2wf@bigpond.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 09:44:18 +1100
I have to agree with Mike, physical strength is important. I am on an exposed ridge where the winds are quite strong. I use stainless steel wire rope as part of the top hat supported with 19mm dia al
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00012.html (10,060 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size (score: 1)
Author: "Adrian Van Der Byl" <vk2wf@bigpond.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 09:53:26 +1100
Sorry it seems the link I posted got broken. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=440029073004475&set=pcb.745473342286 826&type=3&theater&ifg=1 73 Adrian VK2WF I have to agree with Mike, physical
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00013.html (10,532 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu