Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+CQWW\s+SSB\s+\&\s+Our\s+Continuing\s+Bandplan\s+Discussions\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: CQWW SSB & Our Continuing Bandplan Discussions.... (score: 1)
Author: K1ZM@aol.com (K1ZM@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 12:09:27 EDT
Hi Gang Looking over the comments now taking place on our various reflectors, I would like to add some more food for thought as we all look forward to operating in the CQWW SSB in 10 days or so. To c
/archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00131.html (16,432 bytes)

2. Topband: CQWW SSB & Our Continuing Bandplan Discussions.... (score: 1)
Author: earlham@radiks.net (earlham@radiks.net)
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 19:24:01 -0400
I enjoyed reading Jeff's comments and believe he is right on target. It's all about leadership...somebody has to take the torch and run. If some of the highly respected overseas operators on this ban
/archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00132.html (8,162 bytes)

3. Topband: CQWW SSB & Our Continuing Bandplan Discussions.... (score: 1)
Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz (Greg - ZL3IX)
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:35:43 +1300
I agree with Jeff (K1ZM) when he says that folks will soon catch on. Back in the early 70's, before US had operating rights on SSB below 3.8 MHz, all of us in Eu (I was operating G3UBR in those days)
/archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00134.html (7,309 bytes)

4. Topband: CQWW SSB & Our Continuing Bandplan Discussions.... (score: 1)
Author: earlham@radiks.net (Iowa guy)
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 10:40:03 -0500
I didn't mean to imply below that highly regarded overseas operators (like ON4UN) would not observe the bandplan. My comment "I know it won't happen" was referring to people who don't observe the ban
/archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00160.html (7,862 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu