Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+CQWW\s+DX\s+SSB\s+and\s+160\s+Meter\s+Band\s+Plan\s+\-\s+K4ZDH\'s\s+Response\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+CQWW\s+DX\s+SSB\s+and\s+160\s+Meter\s+Band\s+Plan\s+\-\s+K4ZDH\'s\s+Response\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: CQWW DX SSB and 160 Meter Band Plan - K4ZDH's Response (score: 1): Author: ku8e1@yahoo.com (Jeffrey Clarke); Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 06:26:18 -0700 (PDT); K1ZM recently asked K4ZDH for guidance with respect to our upcoming CQWW SSB contest operations. Specifically, it was asked if he expected the new 160M bandplan to be supported and if he might be lis; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00156.html (7,325 bytes)
2. Topband: CQWW DX SSB and 160 Meter Band Plan - K4ZDH's Response (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 14:16:55 EDT; Is K4ZDH stating he is going to allow this or not? It seemed like a pretty basic question. My guess is that if you operate below 1.843MHz, you can always use the arguement that you were looking for a; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00167.html (10,034 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]