Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+CQ\s+WW\s+160\s+CW\s+\-\s+SK\.\.\s+\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. ? (score: 1)
Author: uy0zg <uy0zg@mksat.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:07:39 +0200
Hi The people! It is urgent to change the name of the contest! Correct - CQ World Wide WEB-SDR 160-Meter Contest ..... US1Q - first in Europe ... UA7K - third in Europe... https://www.cq160.com/raw.h
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00068.html (7,136 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. ? (score: 1)
Author: Henk Remijn PA5KT via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:47:49 +0100
These remarks should go to the contest committee not to this maillist. 73 Henk PA5KT Op 11-2-2020 om 11:07 schreef uy0zg: Hi The people! It is urgent to change the name of the contest! Correct - CQ W
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00069.html (7,876 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. ? (score: 1)
Author: uy0zg <uy0zg@mksat.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:13:02 +0200
Why ? Tu all friends! -- Nick, UY0ZG http://www.topband.in.ua Henk Remijn PA5KT via Topband 2020-02-11 13:47: These remarks should go to the contest committee not to this maillist. 73 Henk PA5KT Op 1
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00070.html (9,083 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. ? (score: 1)
Author: Henk Remijn PA5KT via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:28:15 +0100
Because we you have sent similars mails already 50 times. Everybody knows there are people cheating. Just ignore them. 73 Henk PA5KT Op 11-2-2020 om 13:13 schreef uy0zg: Why ? Tu all friends! -- Nick
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00071.html (9,882 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. ? (score: 1)
Author: uy0zg <uy0zg@mksat.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:36:39 +0200
"Everybody knows there are people cheating." Henk All essence in the size of a deceit! -- Nick, UY0ZG http://www.topband.in.ua Henk Remijn PA5KT via Topband 2020-02-11 14:28: Because we you have sent
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00072.html (7,529 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. ? (score: 1)
Author: Robert Brennan via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 10:12:31 -0500
Did anyone else work Em2q recently? I worked them in December and I dont have any QSL information can anybody help me Bob ad6hf Sent from my iPhone _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.c
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00073.html (8,116 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. ? (score: 1)
Author: Henk Remijn PA5KT via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 22:26:03 +0100
I got a lot of negative private comments on my email. I think people who subscribe to this maillist are not the people who are cheating. Maybe I am wrong. I hope not. I am subscribed to this maillist
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00074.html (9,282 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. ? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:01:48 -0800
I would expect subjects like: propagation, antennas, operating practice, etc. Not endless mails why Digital is bad, cheating is bad, etc is bad, all others are bad. Try to be positive. YES! 73, Jim K
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00075.html (8,947 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. ? (score: 1)
Author: Dan Edward Dba East edwards <dan.n.edwards@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 22:55:59 +0000 (UTC)
agree, Henk & jim.. unfortunately, trolls are everywhere, now.. regards, w5xz, dan YES! 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector ____
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00076.html (8,654 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. ? (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:52:35 -0700
Just use your delete key and move on.  Don't let the actions of others ruin a great resource. W0MU I would expect subjects like: propagation, antennas, operating practice, etc. Not endless mails why
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00077.html (9,352 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. ? (score: 1)
Author: fmoeves <fmoeves@twc.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:13:42 -0500
Yes sir could not have said it better. Fred KB4QZH  -- Original message --From: Henk Remijn PA5KT via Topband <topband@contesting.com> Date: 2/11/20 4:26 PM (GMT-05:00) To: topband@contesting.com Sub
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00078.html (9,100 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. ? (score: 1)
Author: W7RH <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 23:53:34 +0000
To be honest I don't think there is a code of ethics anymore at least not in award chasing in Ham radio. To give example I recently heard a very prominent operator and Dx'er on FT8. In three calls fr
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00084.html (9,083 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu