Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+CQ\s+WW\s+160\s+CW\s+\-\s+SK\.\.\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:18:35 -0500
I have to differ somewhat with the comment that Topband Reflector should not be used to discuss suspect cheating on 160M. Where else can someone's concern that "that just doesn't sound/look/smell rig
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00079.html (6,903 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:03:34 -0800
The CQ Contesting reflector has had some good discussions on this topic, especially because it includes hams who serve to help administer major contests. As far as I know, Tree is the only one of tho
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00080.html (7,239 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:38:01 -0400
If UY0ZG believes several of his countrymates are cheating, then he should seek assistance in gathering evidence and present it to the good folks at CQ160 (ie: I believe it's currently Andy, N2NT & c
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00081.html (7,052 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:49:22 -0800
All - Mike is correct - instead of yelling on this channel about possible cheating - working with the contest sponsors is the best way to make something happen. Sometimes, it will take a little time
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00082.html (8,114 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. (score: 1)
Author: uy0zg <uy0zg@mksat.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 02:11:54 +0200
You probably think that I am pleased to talk about crooks? There is an destruction of amateur radio! And nobody does anything ... -- Nick, UY0ZG http://www.topband.in.ua Tree 2020-02-13 01:49: All -
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00085.html (9,354 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 19:31:42 -0600
Still taking pokes at the FT8 ops. What would constitute an exceptional achievement on FT8? Thats like telling CW guys that their achievements arent really noteworthy compared to how the Sideband guy
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00087.html (8,611 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 18:42:14 -0700
Hey don't leave out AM or spark gap! What would constitute an exceptional achievement on FT8? Thats like telling CW guys that their achievements arent really noteworthy compared to how the Sideband g
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00088.html (9,082 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 20:42:37 -0500
Working sub-audible signals form JA to Zone 2 comes to mind. Or exploring daylight paths that dont support audible signals. They are all interesting and achievements in their own right, they just nee
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00089.html (9,295 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. (score: 1)
Author: Steven Daniel <nn4t@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 19:52:02 -0600
Isnt it amazing that unless someone does it just as you did (old tech, no internet, output power limited by LORAN, etc.) that their achievement doesnt quite make the grade? After all, nobodys seen th
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00090.html (9,697 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu