Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+CQ\s+160\s+CW\s+Contest\s+Observations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+CQ\s+160\s+CW\s+Contest\s+Observations\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: CQ 160 CW Contest Observations (score: 1): Author: <ku8e@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:16:38 -0500; Some observations on the contest : 1) Why do US/VE stations still insist on transmitting in the DX window ? I told a couple guys they were in the DX window and they basically ignored me. One of the g; /archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00347.html (8,768 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: CQ 160 CW Contest Observations (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:12:52 -0500; CA then PEI is from EU and I only get 2 points a QSO and they get 10 points for a closer distance. This rule discourages people other then those who have a propagation advantage from seriously opera; /archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00350.html (8,408 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: CQ 160 CW Contest Observations (score: 1): Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:08:23 +0000 (GMT); The scoring system is quite unfair, but it is considerably less unfair than when it gave NA two complete nights and much of the rest of the world only one! 160m is not a very geographically fair band; /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00005.html (8,022 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]