Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+COSMIC\s+RAY\s+UPDATE\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+COSMIC\s+RAY\s+UPDATE\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 13:24:16 -0500; This could account for relatively poor conditions on 160 despite the low SF and K indices: *COSMIC RAY UPDATE:* Something ironic is happening in Earths atmosphere. Solar activity is lowvery low. Yet; /archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00115.html (6,893 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 11:22:06 -0800; This morning - I put 21 Europeans in the log. Guess conditions are not that bad. Tree N6TR _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00116.html (7,596 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE (score: 1): Author: K9FD <merv.k9fd@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 10:16:16 -1000; This morning conditions were close to, not quite as good as 2008 era. A5 was a good signal drawing a big crowd, 4S7 good signal even after sunrise, lot of Asian Russians, EU Russians, EU from nort; /archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00117.html (8,994 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE (score: 1): Author: "Chortek, Robert L." <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 21:27:34 +0000; Please dont laugh at my puny numbers. This season I have worked 5 European stations from my noise challenged postage stamp lot in San Jose. The last time I was able to hear and work a European statio; /archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00118.html (8,205 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE (score: 1): Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 12:19:41 -0800; During the last minimum, there were times when high northern latitude stations in zone 17 and 18 would be very strong for long periods of time here in southern California. Last Sunday morning during; /archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00119.html (8,723 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 16:33:24 -0500; Not bad but definitely not great either. Nobody (USA SOHP/160) has broken 100k so far in CQWWCW for this cycle low. There were 6 consecutive years over 100k (2005-2010) for the previous cycle low. K9; /archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00120.html (10,288 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE (score: 1): Author: Nicholas Hall-Patch <nhp@ieee.org>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 01:12:43 +0000; But doesn't the graph referenced in your link https://spaceweather.com/repeat_images/crinfo2.png indicate that the greatest strength from cosmic rays was 2009-2010, when trans polar conditions were a; /archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00121.html (9,115 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 22:27:47 -0500; Could be that good conditions are just ahead but they better hurry up. The 6 years of >100k scores in the last cycle versus none so far in this one seems to indicate something is very different about; /archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00122.html (10,498 bytes)
9. Topband: cosmic ray update (score: 1): Author: Larry via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 05:02:51 +0000 (UTC); for what it's worth here are my scores from past years:2007 247,0002009 618,0002010 752,000 (83 countries)2011 600,0002012 324,0002013 367,0002014 312,0002015 319,0002016 278,00; /archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00123.html (8,455 bytes)
10. Topband: cosmic ray update (score: 1): Author: Larry via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 05:15:03 +0000 (UTC); well that came out unreadable! try again. scores over the past years: 2009 618,000, 2010 752,000(83 countries), 2011 600,000, 2012 324,000, 2013 367,000. 2014 312,000, 2015; /archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00124.html (7,989 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 06:31:49 -0500; The 20 all time highest CQ160CW scores for USA:: Year Instances (ranks) 2018: 1 (#9) 2017: 1 (#20) 2013: 1 (#18) 2011: 4 (#5, 8, 11, 15) 2010: 3 (#3, 6, 10) 2009: 10 (#1, 2, 4, 7, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17,; /archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00130.html (13,809 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE (score: 1): Author: "Chortek, Robert L." <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 14:42:46 +0000; I hope you are right! That would mean at least two great seasons back to make. Wouldnt that be nice after the tough years weve had!?! Worked two more EU this morning. Good for me! 73, Bob AA6VB _____; /archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00131.html (9,187 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE (score: 1): Author: Carl Luetzelschwab <carlluetzelschwab@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 09:49:45 -0500; Hi to everyone, (GCRs) result in more electrons down low in the ionosphere (from collisional ionization) - where ionospheric absorption occurs. So one would think that the more cosmic rays, the more; /archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00132.html (9,051 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE (score: 1): Author: MICHAEL ST ANGELO <mstangelo@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 10:48:37 -0500 (EST); I attribute the decline in participation to the raising noise floor and the aging population of ham radio operators. I been operating 160 since I moved to the present location form a city lot in 1998; /archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00133.html (9,922 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 09:59:25 -0600; Interesting. After reading that Spaceweather article, I had my radiation detector app running on my tablet two days ago, and there was no doubt that it was picking up significantly more counts per mi; /archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00134.html (9,835 bytes)
16. Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE (score: 1): Author: Mark Lunday <wd4elg@outlook.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 16:26:55 +0000; I agree with you, Mike. It would be interesting to survey the average age of our top-band subscribers (Tree, was this done already and I missed it?) I started on top band in 2007, and really started; /archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00135.html (10,580 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE (score: 1): Author: MICHAEL ST ANGELO <mstangelo@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 11:49:44 -0500 (EST); Mark, I hear you. As an engineer I basically worked a sedentary office job during the day and operated at night. When I retired I figured I would have more time but I make it a point of being active.; /archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00136.html (9,573 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]