Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+CONNECTORS\s+AND\s+CABLE\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+CONNECTORS\s+AND\s+CABLE\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: CONNECTORS AND CABLE (score: 1): Author: "Bill and Liz McHugh" <magoo@isp.ca>; Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 08:36:08 -0500; There is only ONE way to properly install a PL-259 connector and if you are not using that method then anything can happen. New connectors won't make any difference to system integrity unless they ar; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00032.html (6,659 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: CONNECTORS AND CABLE (score: 1): Author: Andrey Fedorishchev <ra6lbs@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 19:06:56 +0400; Cheap RG6, the one with CCS center conductor, sometimes shows quiet high losses (few db per 300ft.) at 1-5 mhz and at the same time quiet low at higher frequencies; Not only the losses but signal lea; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00033.html (7,631 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: CONNECTORS AND CABLE (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 09:56:16 -0800; Yes on both counts. I've written a Q&A style tutorial about coax that addresses these issues, and a lot more. http://audiosystemsgroup.com/Coax-Stubs.pdf Another point -- some of us DO have long runs; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00034.html (7,650 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: CONNECTORS AND CABLE (score: 1): Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 13:48:04 -0600; Here we go again. One camp saying don't go cheap and another camp saying cheap is fine. I pay 5 cents a foot for flooded RG-6 from Shaw Cable. Copper coated steel center plus braid and foil. My recei; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00038.html (8,478 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: CONNECTORS AND CABLE (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 12:27:18 -0800; Loss doesn't matter for RX antennas, but shielding does. DXE says that the flooded Commscope RG6 they sell resists rodents. Commscope is a good cable company. I laid two runs of a non-flooded Commsco; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00039.html (8,333 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: CONNECTORS AND CABLE (score: 1): Author: Andrey Fedorishchev <ra6lbs@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 02:01:55 +0400; here in Russia, we love cheap cables too, and of cource they are OK in many many cases and serve for years, but I learned hard way and not once that if your need a trouble free life then go proven qu; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00040.html (9,789 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: CONNECTORS AND CABLE (score: 1): Author: "sebdesnCC" <sebdesn@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 19:33:26 -0700; Mr Brown, that is a seriously good paper on the subject!!!..thanks for posting it!! Bud W0HG _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00045.html (7,335 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: CONNECTORS AND CABLE (score: 1): Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:06:05 -0500; Loss at 160 is determined by the thickness of the copper plating and even the best will have a bit more loss than all copper. An additional 1dB/100' of resistive loss in a 200-300' run means nothing; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00050.html (10,802 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: CONNECTORS AND CABLE (score: 1): Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:24:19 -0500; Commscope cable is no more rodent proof than any other quality brand. If DXE charges more for it then its not worth it economically. I also use Commscope but I buy in 1000' reels via my Tessco commer; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00051.html (10,493 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]