Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Blocking\s+Dynamic\s+Range\,\s+here\s+we\s+agree\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Blocking\s+Dynamic\s+Range\,\s+here\s+we\s+agree\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Blocking Dynamic Range, here we agree (score: 1): Author: Robert McGwier <rwmcgwier@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:55:22 -0500; Where I grew up in Alabama with a Methodist preacher father, we were too poor to have red clay dirt roads so that would have been the lap of luxury. ;-). Blocking dynamic range is an often touted fig; /archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00175.html (11,628 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Blocking Dynamic Range, here we agree (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 10:06:44 -0500; I think perhaps this is what Tom was attempting to say or SHOULD HAVE SAID and if so, we agree that the 100 dB BDR versus 150 dB BDR for the FT1000D is a thing. My disagreement with the published num; /archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00180.html (11,921 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]