Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Beverage\s+versus\s+K9AY\s+versus\s+short\s+verticals\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Beverage versus K9AY versus short verticals (score: 1)
Author: <doktorij@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 13:25:21 -0400
Hello All, I'm new on the list. I'm sarting to prepare antennas for the Fall and am contemplating adding a Rx antenna or two. I have enough room to lay out a short beverage(s) of about 300'. I know i
/archives//html/Topband/2006-07/msg00047.html (7,373 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Beverage versus K9AY versus short verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:42:45 -0700
The beverage is the way to go to reject stateside QRM. If I am listening to the east coast on a beverage, stations off the side are just inaudible, even big guns. My beverages are only 400 feet and
/archives//html/Topband/2006-07/msg00048.html (7,130 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Beverage versus K9AY versus short verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:40:03 -0400
For many years, I've used "Shorty Beverages" (2-wire type) ranging in length from 200- to 400-feet, and they all have proven useful from my 200 x 400 foot lot. There have even been some Top 10 M/S f
/archives//html/Topband/2006-07/msg00049.html (9,698 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Beverage versus K9AY versus short verticals (score: 1)
Author: "John Rogers" <johnr1g3pqa@onetel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:17:42 +0100
vertical(s). Seperation may be as little as 10', definitely no more than 60'. I use a 3ft high 350ft E-W beverage only 20ft behind my shunt fed 160m vertical and in practice it works well both in re
/archives//html/Topband/2006-07/msg00050.html (8,221 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu