Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Beverage\s+height\s+experiment\s+results\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Beverage\s+height\s+experiment\s+results\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Beverage height experiment results (score: 1): Author: rick@area.com (Rick Karlquist); Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 09:16:29 -0800; Over the past several years I have experimented with various Beverage antennas at heights of 5 and 10 feet. There was anecdotal evidence that the 5 ft ones outperformed the 10 foot ones, and that eve; /archives//html/Topband/2000-11/msg00132.html (9,634 bytes)
2. Fw: Topband: Beverage height experiment results (score: 1): Author: jmaass@columbus.rr.com (Jeff Maass); Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 13:38:42 -0500; N6RK: On a related note, is there any good reason why two Beverages couldn't be mounted on the same supports? As they are not resonant antennas, I would think that this should work OK. I want to try; /archives//html/Topband/2000-11/msg00135.html (7,756 bytes)
3. Topband: Beverage height experiment results (score: 1): Author: 4x4nj@iname.com (R. Kline); Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 22:28:00 -0000; All 4 of my Beverages are laying on the ground, and some of them even go underneath roads! They are made of rugged military field telephone wire, and work fine. This is likely due to the very poor so; /archives//html/Topband/2000-11/msg00137.html (7,426 bytes)
4. Fw: Topband: Beverage height experiment results (score: 1): Author: w8ji@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 17:58:59 -0500; Hi Jeff, Mutual coupling is mutual coupling. It is not affected by resonance. I think what has misled you is that non-resonant guyline or nonresonant antennas near other antennas absorb and re-radia; /archives//html/Topband/2000-11/msg00138.html (8,194 bytes)
5. Topband: Beverage height experiment results (score: 1): Author: w8ji@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 18:17:53 -0500; Hi Rick, On 40 meters, I seem to find low height Beverages are better. My ten foot high wires give me the impression they are not nearly as good on 40 as my six foot high antennas. On 80, I seem to s; /archives//html/Topband/2000-11/msg00142.html (9,377 bytes)
6. Topband: Beverage height experiment results (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it); Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 10:57:41 +0100; On weak signals, the antenna efficiency still plays a role and it has to be found, of course when it's possible, an optimal compromise between directivity and available signals at antenna terminals.; /archives//html/Topband/2000-11/msg00143.html (9,744 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]