Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Bev\s+wire\s+under\s+a\s+path\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Bev wire under a path? (score: 1)
Author: "Neil G0JHC" <g0jhc@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 05:23:26 -0800
I currently have a 585ft Bev, which at around 200ft has to pass over a gravel track which is 12-15ft wide. Currently I have installed 2 poles either side of the path. These poles are 20ft high (so a
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00089.html (7,271 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Bev wire under a path? (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 09:05:02 -0500
My Northwest Beverage does exactly what you are proposing. It crosses a shared gravel driveway that leads to my home. Fortunately, there are small trees on each side of the driveway (in fact, they ho
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00091.html (8,778 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Bev wire under a path? (score: 1)
Author: "Ryszard Tymkiewicz" <rtym@ippt.gov.pl>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 15:33:10 +0100
<Has anyone any experience of the effect on performance. I will be burying <approx. 2-3% of its total length. Neil & All, I was using this kind of passing roads quite often....usually the distance wa
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00094.html (7,635 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Bev wire under a path? (score: 1)
Author: "John G3PQA" <g3pqa@onetel.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 06:56:11 -0800
Bud is right for a single wire beverage, where matching is not important, but dont expect to have a good f/back ratio with a 2-wire. However the gravel will help a little as it is non conductive, but
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00095.html (10,182 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Bev wire under a path? (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 11:18:01 -0500
You could also shorten the Beverage length with loading coil(s) and run coax under the gravel if thats a possible option. Since the coils slow down the wave a bit you have to factor in the velocity f
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00106.html (9,867 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu