Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Best\s+coax\s+for\s+direct\s+burial\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Best\s+coax\s+for\s+direct\s+burial\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Best coax for direct burial? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Garland" <4cx250b@miamioh.edu>; Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 09:25:08 -0600; My forthcoming 160m vertical requires about a 700 ft run of coax. I'd like to bury the coax over most of the run, but some of it will be elevated, with high UV exposure. (I'm at 7000 ft elevation and; /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00301.html (7,767 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Best coax for direct burial? (score: 1): Author: Anthony Scandurra <anthony.scandurra@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 11:36:37 -0400; Jim, Davis RF BuryFlex is the way to go. It has a PE jacket, a stranded copper center conductor, it's direct burial (just as the name implies), and it handles direct sunlight exposure very well. I ha; /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00302.html (8,408 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Best coax for direct burial? (score: 1): Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:07:01 -0400; Jim You cant get any more reliable than 1/2" Andrew or similar hardline. In this area its free or very cheap and often with connectors as 2 way shops close down and customers keep migrating to cell p; /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00340.html (9,465 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]