- 1. Topband: Band Plan comments. (score: 1)
- Author: k5ab@texas.net (Alan Brown)
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:26:12 -0500
- Jeff, KU8E, asks a very real question about the CQWW SSB contest. In his note to the TopBand Reflector, he asks basically " will stations within the USA truly operate above 1843 KHz, during the conte
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00115.html (8,045 bytes)
- 2. Topband: Band Plan comments. (score: 1)
- Author: w8ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 17:30:29 -0400
- I suspect the Commission (Riley) will not have a significant amount of indigestion if US contest participants use common sense ... including: 1) Don't call CQ (run) below 1843 on phone! 2) Transmit
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00117.html (8,365 bytes)
- 3. Topband: Band Plan comments. (score: 1)
- Author: earlham@radiks.net (earlham@radiks.net)
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 19:09:36 -0400
- With 200 KHz of bandwidth available, there certainly is no real shortage of spectrum in the 160 meter band. The internationally recognized and agreed upon band plans for the remaining bands are not v
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00119.html (9,266 bytes)
- 4. Topband: Band Plan comments. (score: 1)
- Author: nr1dx@tellink.net (NR1DX)
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 04:23:21 +0000
- All I was quite pleased to see the wide spread support "in practice" a few years back when we were all asked to respect the DX window during the 160 M contests. It is now very rare to find US station
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00124.html (11,020 bytes)
- 5. Topband: Band Plan comments. (score: 1)
- Author: k9uwa@arrl.net (John K9UWA)
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 00:21:53 -0500
- Well personally.....I hope Riley does yell if he hears any US SSB signal below 1843.... If won't take the DX stations more than 5 minutes to figure out that they have to listen up to work USA.....wh
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00125.html (7,484 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu