Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Baker\s+Island\s+DXpedition\s+condx\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Baker\s+Island\s+DXpedition\s+condx\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Baker Island DXpedition condx (score: 1): Author: Bryon Paul Veal NŲAH <bryonveal@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 18:02:11 +0000; I have no doubt they will be successful on the lowbands with what should hopefully be an ambient free RF zone- Despite the short windows, and my guess 30M will be their best band, if you want to call; /archives//html/Topband/2018-06/msg00107.html (12,310 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Baker Island DXpedition condx (score: 1): Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 11:26:05 -0700; According to the latest Clublog DX Report, 20-meters is still the money band; 34% of all reported contacts made during the last 7 days were on 20. Of those, 41% were DX contacts. Second was 40-mete; /archives//html/Topband/2018-06/msg00108.html (10,175 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Baker Island DXpedition condx (score: 1): Author: <n4is@n4is.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 16:38:36 -0400; There is a fine line between "know" and "believe". Like detuning your tower, directivity increase signal to noise ratio. You need RX antenna on 160m in a quiet place. Antenna over salt water is one o; /archives//html/Topband/2018-06/msg00110.html (9,174 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]