Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+BOG\s+\-\s+maybe\s+two\s+or\s+three\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+BOG\s+\-\s+maybe\s+two\s+or\s+three\s+\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: BOG - maybe two or three ? (score: 1): Author: "Gary Marks" <gmarks@neo.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:24:03 -0500; It sounds like zig-zagging a 500' BOG isn't a good idea but I could run one in a straight line for 300 ft. Has anyone tried running two or three BOG antennas in a straight line parallel to each other; /archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00076.html (6,640 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: BOG - maybe two or three ? (score: 1): Author: Greg - ZL3IX <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>; Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 07:03:42 +1300; Gary, both the signal and the noise would be stronger, so there would be no advantage. In order to gain some directivity and hence S/N advantage, you would need broadside spacing, preferably of a hal; /archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00079.html (7,564 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]