Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+BC\s+filter\s+follow\-up\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+BC\s+filter\s+follow\-up\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: BC filter follow-up (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:05:53 -0500; Thanks to everyone who sent suggestions on my problem. Those who did not receive a personal thank-you note is because mail to you bounced. I thought it might be helpful to post a follow-up with links; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00092.html (8,905 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: BC filter follow-up (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:42:49 -0800; Attenuation at the top of the band (near cutoff) is the toughest to achieve, the Clifton filter looks awfully good, and the cost is quite reasonable. If I had your problem, that would be my choice. 7; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00098.html (7,460 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: BC filter follow-up (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 11:04:25 -0800; The Clifton filter is a Chebyshev, with only 14 dB attenuation at 1.7 MHz. What you really want is an elliptic function filter, of which there are several available. These can provide much more atten; /archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00101.html (7,447 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]