Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Are\s+US\s+Possession\s+DX\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Are\s+US\s+Possession\s+DX\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Are US Possession DX? (score: 1): Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@surfvi.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:14:19 -0400; The ARRL has informed me that my entry in the 160 Meter contest was not listed because the Virgin Islands are regarded *not* as DX but as a domestic W/VE entry. The various contest programs that I ha; /archives//html/Topband/2006-06/msg00066.html (7,905 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Are US Possession DX? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:40:50 -0400; Herb, So why was it not listed in the proper category (VI Section) instead of not being listed? The rules are suspiciously silent on the status of US Possessions. However, multipliers are W/VE sectio; /archives//html/Topband/2006-06/msg00067.html (7,101 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Are US Possession DX? (score: 1): Author: "Chuck Dietz" <W5PR@swbell.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:40:09 -0500; I don't care what ARRL thinks, Herb is some fine DX here on Topband! Chuck W5PR _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com; /archives//html/Topband/2006-06/msg00068.html (6,630 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Are US Possession DX? (score: 1): Author: herbs@surfvi.com; Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:59:51 -0400; Quoting ku8e@bellsouth.net: Jeff, I used CT Version 10.0.0.1 which prohibits me from logging non-US DX. I suppose the Rules should make it clear that *any U.S. Possession for the purpose of this cont; /archives//html/Topband/2006-06/msg00071.html (7,243 bytes)
5. Topband: Are US Possession DX? (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 07:16:11 -0400; KV4FZ: Jeff, I used CT Version 10.0.0.1 which prohibits me from logging non-US DX. I suppose the Rules should make it clear that *any U.S. Possession for the purpose of this contest is considered W/V; /archives//html/Topband/2006-06/msg00072.html (7,019 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Are US Possession DX? (score: 1): Author: herbs@surfvi.com; Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:57:49 -0400; Quoting "Richard L. King" <k5na@ecpi.com>: Well Richard the first part is correct but I do remember as far back in the 50's when Cuba was an ARRL section. My point here is that if they still were a A; /archives//html/Topband/2006-06/msg00073.html (8,126 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Are US Possession DX? (score: 1): Author: Greg Chartrand <w7my@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 09:12:19 -0700 (PDT); One thing consistent about the ARRL regarding the 160 contest is their discouragement of DX participation by limiting multipliers. For better or worse, it makes the contest unique. Greg W7MY -- Sneak; /archives//html/Topband/2006-06/msg00074.html (7,419 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: Are US Possession DX? (score: 1): Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:23:25 -0500; ...snip... Herb, and others... http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/org/secinfo.html The traditional US sections are listed, along with the following: Pacific -- Hawaii and U.S. possessions in the Pacifi; /archives//html/Topband/2006-06/msg00077.html (9,945 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]