Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Antenna\s+Question\,\s+Sorry\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Antenna Question, Sorry (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Nathan" <k7rx@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 07:02:20 -0700
Hi All, I apologize for raising a topic that I know has been spoken of on here before but I am looking for advice and since I am blind, I really can't use EZNEC or other modeling programs very well d
/archives//html/Topband/2005-08/msg00017.html (8,389 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Antenna Question, Sorry (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:16:13 -0700
Kevin, This antenna should perform well for DX on 160m. With 65 foot vertical and 95 feet horizontal wire, the feed impedance is about 30 ohms plus ground loss R in series with about 189 ohms of indu
/archives//html/Topband/2005-08/msg00019.html (8,935 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Antenna Question, Sorry (score: 1)
Author: "George (K8GG) & Marijke Guerin" <gmguerin@voyager.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:30:00 -0400
Kevin, Terry, etc. I agree with the trap approach for 80 meters on an inverted-L for 160. We did that about 10 years ago with an inverted-L up about 85 feet and out about 75 feet. Putting the trap in
/archives//html/Topband/2005-08/msg00020.html (7,759 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu