Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Antenna\s+Noise\s+canceller\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Antenna\s+Noise\s+canceller\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Antenna Noise canceller (score: 1): Author: "Josep" <ea6bf@ya.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:42:03 -0000; I have been told about the Timewave Antenna Noise Canceller ANC-4 to be a good device to reduce or cancel power line noises, etc... I would like to hear from people using this device specially on 160; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00134.html (6,452 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Antenna Noise canceller (score: 1): Author: Colman Ahern <Smokey@ziplink.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:53:51 -0800; http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/1138?ehamsid=445f75438dd511f8958c8ea94f862227 Some reviews of the Timewave ANC-4. Colman Ahern. Berkeley Calif. _______________________________________________ Topb; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00135.html (7,303 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Antenna Noise canceller (score: 1): Author: "Tod -MN" <tod@k0to.us>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:12:23 -0600; Josep: It may be informative to look at one of my web pages that has several links to experiments I performed using an MFJ-1026. I believe the ANC-4 is similar though not identical to the 1026. You w; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00136.html (7,499 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Antenna Noise canceller (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:00:03 -0800; The biggest con is that it is a NASTY key click generator. Problem is in the detection circuit that samples transmitted RF to control switching from transmit to receive. I learned the hard way -- goo; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00137.html (7,223 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: Antenna Noise canceller (score: 1): Author: SavageBR@aol.com; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:04:40 EST; I have both. I use the MFJ 1026. It has individual RF gain controls for both the signal channel and the noise channel. The ANC-4 has a "Gain Control" for the nose channel only. With individual gain c; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00138.html (7,674 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Antenna Noise canceller (score: 1): Author: "Tim Duffy K3LR" <k3lr@k3lr.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:07:36 -0600; I have recently had great success with the DX Engineering Noise Canceling Controller (NCC-1). For years we used the MFJ 1025 which worked very well. I was able to more consistently peak signals (incr; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00139.html (7,573 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Antenna Noise canceller (score: 1): Author: Gary and Kathleen Pearse <pearse@gci.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:40:32 -0900; One not too secret secret is to place the noise canceler inline with the receiver output/input jacks (if has them), instead of inline with the antenna in/out fitting on the radio...connect the receiv; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00140.html (7,979 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: Antenna Noise canceller (score: 1): Author: Gary and Kathleen Pearse <pearse@gci.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:22:22 -0900; I have two selectable low-gain noise sense antennas feeding my MFJ-1026. Each are 10M dipoles, but could be any length, one vertical/one horizontal, to match the polarization of whatever noise sourc; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00145.html (8,911 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]