Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Antena\s+RX\s+for\s+160Mtrs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Antena\s+RX\s+for\s+160Mtrs\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Antena RX for 160Mtrs (score: 1): Author: Pete Parisetti <hb9dsu@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:03:42 +0100; Hola Eduardo, I have tried small coax loops by KC2TX ( http://www.qsl.net/kc2tx/lb_loop1.htm) and did not find them an improvement over my L. Others have, though. Then I have built the loop described; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00059.html (7,372 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Antena RX for 160Mtrs (score: 1): Author: Bob McGwier <rwmcgwier@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:00:56 -0500; http://www.w8ji.com/antennas.com http://www.arrl.org/catalog/?item=9140 http://w5zn.org/160%20Meters.html 73's N4HY -- (Co)Author: DttSP, Quiktrak, PowerSDR, GnuRadio Member: ARRL, AMSAT, AMSAT-DL, T; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00064.html (8,079 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Antena RX for 160Mtrs (score: 1): Author: Björn Mohr <bm@broadcast.se>; Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 20:18:36 +0100; Hi Eduardo, I have been using this type of coax loop that Pete describes with good results. I believe the key is to place it as far from the TX antenna as possible, and if possible make sure the null; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00068.html (7,721 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]