Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Another\s+radial\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Another\s+radial\s+question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Another radial question (score: 1): Author: "Bill Axelrod" <bill@axelrods.org>; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:14:44 -0500; I have a 160 meter vertical with two 1/4 elevated radials. It does OK but could be much better. I bought 5,000 feet of wire to get a start at laying down ground radials as time permits. My question f; /archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00221.html (6,895 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Another radial question (score: 1): Author: w8av@aol.com; Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:33:39 -0500; Bill: Take down the elevated radials. Having the elevated radials above the radials on the ground will buy you nothing but potential headaches. I have never been a believer in elevated radials. They; /archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00225.html (7,091 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Another radial question (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 08:22:48 EST; Bill: Take down the elevated radials. Having the elevated radials above the radials on the ground will buy you nothing but potential headaches. I have never been a believer in elevated radials. They; /archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00004.html (7,134 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]