Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Additional\s+Comments\s+on\s+Impact\s+of\s+Remote\s+RX\s+Systems\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Additional Comments on Impact of Remote RX Systems (score: 1)
Author: John Crovelli <w2gd@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:07:47 -0400
This has been a great discussion.....nearly 50 posts on the remote RX question this week....nice job everyone.....we even managed to keep it fairly 'civil'. I went back and read all of your posts a s
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00196.html (10,715 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Additional Comments on Impact of Remote RX Systems (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Garrett" <rgarrett5@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 23:18:46 -0400
Hello John et al, Nice summary. As someone who is certainly new to contesting but not to chasing DX on 160 meters, here are my thoughts regarding remote receivers. Yes, Topband is hard! If it was eas
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00197.html (7,959 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Additional Comments on Impact of Remote RX Systems (score: 1)
Author: Victor Goncharsky <us5we@bk.ru>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:21:34 +0300
Hi John, I vote for solution B -- 73, Victor Goncharsky US5WE/K1WE (UW5W in VHF contests, ex UB5WE), P.E. UARL Technical and VHF Committies DXCC Honor Roll #1 (Mixed, Phone) DXCC card checker (160 me
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00198.html (7,814 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Additional Comments on Impact of Remote RX Systems (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:39:28 -0500
It has been a long while since I have operated a 160m contest. I remember some very slow hours and having a way to tune a second radio to look for new stations and multipliers would have been great.
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00200.html (8,901 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Additional Comments on Impact of Remote RX Systems (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:18:14 -0400
I agree with John's (KK9A) commentary but not necessarily that it needs a new category. Just add it to the assisted category. Leave the unassisted category as is. Assisted is an evolving slippery slo
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00201.html (8,222 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Additional Comments on Impact of Remote RX Systems (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:18:28 -0500
Brilliant! I like this idea. John KK9A I agree with John's (KK9A) commentary but not necessarily that it needs a new category. Just add it to the assisted category. Leave the unassisted category as i
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00202.html (8,498 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu