Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Abysmal\s+condx\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Abysmal\s+condx\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Abysmal condx (score: 1): Author: Greg - ZL3IX <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>; Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 08:13:51 +1200; My total number of Q's for WPX = 1! Worked NR6O on Saturday night. Called NR4M, NE5D, and WE3C at various times, but they didn't hear me through the summer QRN. That was the sum total of stations hea; /archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00132.html (6,490 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Abysmal condx (score: 1): Author: mike l dol dormann <w7dra@juno.com>; Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 15:10:24 -0700; i had planned to write an article for PileUP! about my wpx effort, until i only worked two stations (NR6O being one, K7SS the other). i did hear four other stations but no luck in contacts. tx: 41/42; /archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00133.html (6,923 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Abysmal condx (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 19:22:14 -0700; Yes, conditions were stinko. NR6O (N6RO) is about 100 miles from me. I spent a lot of time on 40 and 80, but only went to 160 long enough to grab Ken's mult. Didn't even tune up the amp. 40 was OK to; /archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00135.html (8,115 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Abysmal condx (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:13:15 -0400; Yes, conditions weren't great on 160, and thunderstorms always make low band DXing more of a challenge in the summer. Also, conditions on 40 and 20 were spectacular this year, drawing a lot of the cr; /archives//html/Topband/2009-06/msg00012.html (7,208 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]