Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ARRL\s+CW\s+Contest\s*$/: 39 ]

Total 39 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: David Olean <k1whs@metrocast.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:54:44 +0000
I think they might mean 1000, as in resistor or cap values now... 1R5. 4R7. Just a guess. Wes  N7WS Sam(N3XZ) _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Refle
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00155.html (8,927 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:13:57 -0700
1000 has always been K or KW.  I have seen ATT for 100 and nn for 99.  Never heard ARK. W0MU Wes  N7WS Sam(N3XZ) _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Re
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00156.html (9,719 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:37:10 -0700
You may be correct.  Since two stations both used it and to make sure I was reading it correctly, I turned on the K3 decoder and that's what it came up with too.  Maybe we should just log what is rec
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00157.html (9,549 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:20:06 -0600
Tune the amp till the antenna ARKs and back off a little? Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPad _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00169.html (8,612 bytes)

25. Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Kennedy" <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 06:50:00 -0500
Well conditions to NA from EU were pretty good over the weekend. I came on 160m for a couple of hours on Friday Night, and again on Saturday night . . . Managed to work a total of 132 NA stations, wh
/archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00081.html (6,500 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:56:16 -0500
Yes! Signals from EU were huge on 160 for many hours both nights. I had to peer at my radio dial a few times just to be sure I wasn't accidentally on 80 or something. 80 was great too. How far west i
/archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00082.html (8,190 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: David Raymond <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:43:27 -0600
Conditions on 160 from here in the Midwest were dreadful.  I could never hear Roger, G3YRO, well enough to even call.  Other EU beacons like OK1CF were just detectable.  Conditions to Asia weren't an
/archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00083.html (8,921 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: w5zn@w5zn.org
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 07:48:04 -0700
Same down here in Arkansas Dave. Not gud on 160 at all this past weekend during the contest. 73 Joel W5ZN _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00084.html (9,336 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Artek Manuals <Manuals@ArtekManuals.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 09:49:10 -0500
in all I spent about 5 hours mostly from 04:30Z to 07:00Z both nights Signals were generally good . Unusual "spotlight" propagation Friday Night/Saturday morn. Worked a half dozen S5xxx stations ALL
/archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00085.html (8,570 bytes)

30. Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Kennedy" <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:59:05 -0500
Yes, most contacts were on the East Coast . . . farthest West was Oklahoma . . . also worked into Georgia and Florida. But didn't even hear any of the big signals I regularly work in Texas, Colorado,
/archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00086.html (7,715 bytes)

31. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Ilmo Anttil" <ilmo.anttila@qualisys.fi>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 18:15:23 +0200
Also here in North band was lousy on both nights. I managed to work only a couple of dozens Qs, all S&P. I did hear only Northern East Coast. All the indicators K, A, Solar Wind Speed and Proton Dens
/archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00087.html (10,622 bytes)

32. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 11:16:36 -0500
Hi Roger and gang, I operated W9VW which is a pretty big contest station Saturday morning but did not get on 160 meters until 0545 UTC, and I commented to my fellow operators that conditions were abo
/archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00088.html (8,322 bytes)

33. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: wa8wzg@wa8wzg.net
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:16:37 +0000
No Propagation here in AZ either night,,I could hear East Coast stations working EU.. BUT could NOT here anything out here.. Even JA's were VERY slim and weak both mornings.. Still FUN!! Tom N7GP Ex
/archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00089.html (7,994 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:27:24 -0800
No EU prop to CA at all. I saw G3YRO spotted but heard nothing on my new 9 circle RX array. OTOH, I worked over 30 JA's between 0900Z and 1030Z. A fair number were reporting only 100 watts. Also work
/archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00092.html (9,382 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Henk Remijn PA5KT via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:01:11 +0100
Roger, I dont agree with you on the conditions, to me the experience was that the conditions were terrible. On Saturday morning it was terrible, on Sunday morning it was even worse. I only worked 104
/archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00093.html (9,440 bytes)

36. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 21:48:17 -0400
Henk hit the nail squarely on the head - 100%. I'll add that even a lot of the top scorers only had 100-300Q's on 160m for an entire weekends work. The easier Q's (rate) are on other bands. ".Lot of
/archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00105.html (8,217 bytes)

37. Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Kennedy" <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:27:49 -0500
There are obviously SOME stations that come on during a Contest to actually enter (or at least to see how many points they can get if they sent their entry in) . . . However, I would wager that the m
/archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00110.html (8,811 bytes)

38. Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Kennedy" <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 13:01:57 -0500
I came on 160m a couple of times during Friday night, but only worked 15 NA stations, as conditions seemed poor. Saturday night I was doing a late night gig, so didn't get home until 03.30Z. However,
/archives//html/Topband/2023-02/msg00045.html (7,404 bytes)

39. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: uy0zg via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 20:33:07 +0200
Hi The conditions in my area were very poor. 21 QSOs. I did not manage to meet many familiar stations from USA and Canada with big good antennas... It seems that they did not work on CQ at all... --
/archives//html/Topband/2023-02/msg00046.html (8,141 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 39
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu