Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ARRL\s+CW\s+Contest\s*$/: 39 ]

Total 39 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Kennedy" <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 10:52:33 -0500
Very curious . . . I came on 160m last night to see what NA stations I could work in the contest . . . spent half an hour tuning around and only heard 12 stations calling CQ, all of which I worked. I
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00123.html (6,712 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Richard Thorne <rthorne@rthorne.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 10:12:53 -0600
Roger, Rates were probably better on 40m. Guys may move to 160 for a couple mults then back to the band that generates rates. Rich - N5ZC Very curious . . . I came on 160m last night to see what NA s
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00124.html (8,103 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Bill Stewart <cwopr@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 11:39:35 -0500 (EST)
Didn't hear many stateside CQers here in NC either. But quite a few DX stns calling. Pileups were not too bad and I managed, just tuning around and not in the contest, to work into EU, Carib, Cent. A
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00125.html (8,560 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 10:55:47 -0700
I answered your CQ many times with no joy. Wes  N7WS I came on 160m last night to see what NA stations I could work in the contest . . . spent half an hour tuning around and only heard 12 stations ca
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00128.html (7,743 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Fred Moeves <fmoeves@twc.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 13:13:54 -0500
Roger, I stayed on 160 for the evening. I just didn't feel like battling it out with the big guns. I had a laid back fun time working Eu and Caribbean stations. Conditions here in Kentucky were not v
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00129.html (8,478 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: David Olean <k1whs@metrocast.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 21:19:03 +0000
Fred I was not able to be on much Friday evening because of other pressing priorities, but I did note that signals seemed great from my location in southern Maine. Signals from Europe were way up and
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00130.html (10,617 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 15:32:13 -0600
Perhaps you were on at the wrong time. Most of the 160m contest activity will be for 10 minutes or so after the top of the hour. John KK9A Very curious . . . I came on 160m last night to see what NA
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00131.html (7,762 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: donovanf@starpower.net
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 16:57:16 -0500 (EST)
Hi Roger, I heard you CQing early this morning (of course you were already in the log). You had en excellent signal right up there with the best European signals. I hope you try again tonight 73 Fran
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00132.html (9,307 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 15:14:49 -0700
The loudest DX I heard last night was M3LPL.. HI....Bad skimmer decodes for W3LPL. I did work RL3A  and UW2M and lots of Carib and Central America. The band seemed quiet but not that many stations. 
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00133.html (10,018 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 18:28:41 -0400
Yes there is Roger, RATE ! DX and US/VE stns make the minimum amount of contacts on bands with poor rate to get the most mults possible there and then CQ (or S&P) the more productive bands. Why work
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00134.html (8,410 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Fred Moeves <fmoeves@twc.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 07:36:25 -0500
Signals last night in Ky seemed better to me. Many strong signals ...EI7M was very strong here among others. Lots of very weak stations that must have very good RX antennas was I surprised that I was
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00135.html (11,060 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Mark Lunday <wd4elg@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 17:21:09 +0000
Due to other commitments, I only had an hour on Saturday evening to do S&P on Top Band for the contest. Signals from EU were not that strong, but the band was quiet. With just 100 watts and a less-th
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00136.html (8,766 bytes)

13. Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Kennedy" <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 20:15:47 -0500
I had forgotten it was a multiband contest, so I now appreciate that's why less NA stations are on calling CQ. Well I came on for a total of about 4 hours over the weekend . . . managed to work a tot
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00137.html (8,161 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: donovanf@starpower.net
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 21:46:21 -0500 (EST)
Hi Roger, Topband propagation to Europe was about as good as it gets this weekend, except Sunday night when it was significantly depressed. I compared your signal to the three other UK stations who w
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00138.html (9,072 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Jean-Paul Albert via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 12:12:01 +0100
Hello Roger, Yesterday night I heard you when you QSO AB8UL. Your receiving system works well, signals we re confortable but not too strong. I called you at the end, but you were gone. During all con
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00140.html (9,824 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Artek Manuals <Manuals@ArtekManuals.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:09:51 -0500
NR1DX: Equipment: 1400W + 60' (20M) high  "T" with 3 elevated radials + Bevs & BOGs Location: Near Tampa Florida Here in Florida, except for Africa and the Carib, we typically do not enjoy the same g
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00146.html (10,394 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: donovanf@starpower.net
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:23:19 -0500 (EST)
Hi Dave, There were several speed demons who were shooting themselves in the foot with endless high speed CQs. Why would anyone send hundreds -- even thousands -- of unanswered high speed CQs on topb
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00147.html (10,479 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Jean-Paul Albert via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 22:07:05 +0100
Hi guys, Right, we must adapt the cw speed to the Band conditions. Personnaly, I was at a speed of 26, and sometimes activing my bencher key... Faster, around 36, is a non sense on top band. 73 Jean-
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00150.html (10,758 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Sam Josuweit" <samjos@epix.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:09:01 -0500
I totally agree. With some of the abbreviations used for this contest it can be even more confusing. Sam(N3XZ) Hi guys, Right, we must adapt the cw speed to the Band conditions. Personnaly, I was at
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00153.html (11,228 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 07:43:27 -0700
I want to know what a power level of "ARK" is.  Copied this from two different stations. Wes  N7WS Sam(N3XZ) _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflec
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00154.html (8,551 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu