Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ARRL\s+160m\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: ARRL 160m (score: 1)
Author: sire@iinet.net.au (Steve Ireland)
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2000 06:56:16 +0800
Hi all, Terrible conditions last night (Saturday) in the ARRL 160 test. W8JI (56/79) was worked just five minutes after sunset (1105Z), but the only other stations heard in 90 minutes of tuning the b
/archives//html/Topband/2000-12/msg00009.html (6,760 bytes)

2. Topband: ARRL 160m (score: 1)
Author: rv1cc@svs.ru (Vlad Sidorov)
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 01:34:22 +0300
Hello, Topbanders! Really bad condition in ARRL160M to USA direction. No contacts with United States. Even nobody heard from US. 1999 ARRL 160M I had 4 contacts, yes, Sun's activity is going up. Satu
/archives//html/Topband/2000-12/msg00017.html (6,985 bytes)

3. Topband: ARRL 160m (score: 1)
Author: "Ilmo Anttila" <ilmo.anttila@qualisys.fi>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 09:22:21 +0200
Worked about 50 NA stations in the contest. It is a long time conditions have been so good for us here in North. Saturday morning was much better than Sunday morning. Most western sections were AZ an
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00039.html (6,557 bytes)

4. Topband: ARRL 160m (score: 1)
Author: VE6WZ_Steve <ve6wz@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 09:35:49 -0700
This was the first time I made a serious attempt at the ARRL 160m contest. Usually I will just poke around and hand out mults. Since condx were looking pretty good, I decided to stay in the chair a b
/archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00082.html (9,837 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: ARRL 160m (score: 1)
Author: "Larry (K8UT)" <K8UT@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 16:53:00 +0000
Steve, RE: CQ hole minutes The latest rev of N1MM's Spectrum Display includes a "CQ Freq Search" enhancement whereby up-to 5 frequencies of sufficient width (based on mode) and vacancy (one minute) a
/archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00083.html (11,338 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: ARRL 160m (score: 1)
Author: Joe Galicic <galicic@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 13:18:04 -0500 (EST)
Steve, I'm sure glad you stayed in the chair long enough to hear and work me. I was running 5 watts. I called you many times throughout the contest before you heard me Saturday evening during prop en
/archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00084.html (12,492 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: ARRL 160m (score: 1)
Author: Ed K1EP <k1ep.list@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 13:27:36 -0500
I think some people used this feature without regard to actually listening first. I had several instances where I was running when stations would just pop on frequency and start CQing in my face. I k
/archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00085.html (13,457 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: ARRL 160m (score: 1)
Author: Harald Rester <harryrester@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 19:26:59 +0100
Steve, thanks for your patience digging out my signal of the noise! 160m QSO with you is a highlite for me. Vy 73 es cuagn, Harry, DH1NBE Am 09.12.2019 um 17:35 schrieb VE6WZ_Steve: This was the firs
/archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00086.html (10,825 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: ARRL 160m (score: 1)
Author: VE6WZ_Steve <ve6wz@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 11:57:37 -0700
Wowgreat stuff Joe! Thanks for that info. On a "miles per watt I think N3HEE qualifies as my best DX during the contest..by a long shot! At 2,000mi/ 5 watts you were 400 miles per watt. EU ranges fro
/archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00087.html (13,249 bytes)

10. Topband: ARRL 160m (score: 1)
Author: Andree DL8LAS via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 17:29:08 +0000 (UTC)
Hey... worked last night 240 NAs in ARRL DX contest on topband. Condx were good and band without noise. Hope to work tonight other 240 NAs :). My call in ARRL DX contest is DR5X. 73 Andy  DL8LAS www.
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00126.html (7,041 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: ARRL 160m (score: 1)
Author: Bill Stewart <cwopr@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 12:36:02 -0500 (EST)
I worked you with my 100 watter Andy...many thanks. 73 and GL in the contest.....Bill K4JYS Hey... worked last night 240 NAs in ARRL DX contest on topband. Condx were good and band without noise. Hop
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00127.html (7,217 bytes)

12. Topband: ARRL 160m (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kile <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 21:25:32 +0000
I spent several hours listening to big gun stations Sunday morning with decent signals to Japan. JA activity appeared very good as on several of the gun stations there were multiple JA responding to
/archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00072.html (7,017 bytes)

13. Topband: ARRL 160m (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Kennedy" <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 17:47:11 -0500
I thought conditions were fairly good, especially on Friday Night. The big NA signals were peaking over S9 here in NorthEast England. I spent about 3 hours in total on the band, and managed to work a
/archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00073.html (6,696 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: ARRL 160m (score: 1)
Author: David Olean <k1whs@metrocast.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:25:00 -0500
I missed you, Roger, I tried to get on Saturday and everything was working great, but a bad storm was coming through with heavy wet snow. There was all sorts of static and my TX antenna VSWR was goin
/archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00079.html (8,267 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu