Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ARRL\s+160\,\s+was\s+Re\:\s+Polarization\s+on\s+160m\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ARRL\s+160\,\s+was\s+Re\:\s+Polarization\s+on\s+160m\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: ARRL 160, was Re: Polarization on 160m (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 17:40:51 -0400; Don't feel bad Herb. I'm in the same boat. I am a VE9..have been since 1993 when they split, NB, NS and VY2 into various distinct prefixes. I live in New Brunswick. (a real Province). Prefix VE9 In 9; /archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00308.html (8,404 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: ARRL 160, was Re: Polarization on 160m (score: 1): Author: kolson@rcn.com; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 02:17:47 -0500 (EST); Errr... if the rules specify RAC sections (just like it specifies ARRL sections in the US) and VE9, VE1 and VY2 are one RAC section rather than three RAC sections, it sounds like your beef w ould be; /archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00317.html (9,876 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]