Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ARRL\'s\s+RM\s+10306\s+\'Reply\s+to\s+Comments\'\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ARRL\'s\s+RM\s+10306\s+\'Reply\s+to\s+Comments\'\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: ARRL's RM 10306 'Reply to Comments' (score: 1): Author: "Dave Bowker" <dbowker@mail.sjv.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:42:16 -0500; Read them for yourself @ http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6518329398 . The ARRL [IMHO] appears poised to RAM THIS DOWN OUR THROATS, regardless of commente; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00191.html (6,881 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: ARRL's RM 10306 'Reply to Comments' (score: 1): Author: "Donald Chester" <k4kyv@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:14:15 +0000; That issue has already been addressed and decided (rejected) by the FCC. It is EXTREMELY rare for the Commission to reverse a decision once they have enacted it into their rules. They have proclaime; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00197.html (7,969 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]